Without diagnosis, you may be required to seek the diagnosis of a medical physician or other "court authorized" diagnostician before you may be allowed to treat.
Potentially, a court of law may determine what you have the capability of "knowing", not only what you have the capability of "practicing".
A Judge, elected through the political processes of the state, is weighing the chiropractic doctor's ability to diagnose.
Without the ability to diagnose, there is no treatment plan to correct a problem identified through diagnosis.
Without a plan for treatment to correct, there is no cause for reimbursement.
Without cause for reimbursement, there is no business.
You could be required to seek the diagnosis of a "court authorized" diagnostician before you may be allowed to treat.
Worried yet? Learn more here:
Why Worry about TMA v TBCE?
TMA v. TBCE; What Does It Mean?
What does the Summary Judgment Mean?
What's the Whole Story Thus Far?
Why the Courts Should Not Determine Scope of Practice
A Physicians Organization's TRUE motivation.
But don't just take OUR word for it
A History of Conflict
TCA members may log in access even more litigation resources under the member's menu.
